Integration testing of object oriented software

In objectoriented systems, testing encompasses three levels, namely, unit testing, integration testing, and system testing. An approach of integration testing for objectoriented programs. Many object oriented software testing activities have counterparts in traditional processes. Nowadays, objectoriented software is more interesting. This thesis proposes a new strategy for integration testing of object oriented. Introduction testing of objectoriented software is complicated by the fact that software being tested is often constructed from a combination of previously written, offtheshelf components with some new. Any incremental class testing approach has to answer the two following questions. Objectyoriented software development is an evolutionary process, and hence the opportunities for integration are abundant.

Application of traditional software testing lore to objectoriented. Briefly explain unit and integration testing in the oo context. Pros and cons of being a software developer duration. The resultant test sets provide more thorough testing than statement and branch coverage. This encompasses state coverage, state transition coverage, and state transition path coverage. Many objectoriented softwaretesting activities have counterparts in traditional processes. Some of the important types of grey box testing are state model based testing. We still have a use for unit testing although the meaning of unit has changed. The purpose of the integration testing is to expose faults in the interaction between integrated units. This research extends an existing singleclass te sting technique to integration testing. The different types of test cases that can be designed for testing objectoriented programs are called grey box test cases. Although there is a fairly large number of reported works on both questions, much remains to be done. Software testing is necessary to realize these benefits by uncovering as many programming errors as possible at a minimum cost.

The purpose is to validate that each unit of the software performs as designed. This paper discusses different software strategies such as unit testing, integration testing, validation testing and techniques such as white box and black box testing for conventional and object. What integration process, indicating in which order classes are integration tested, should be selected. These faults may be unexpected outputs, incorrect messages or operations, and incorrect invocation.

The initial objective of the work is to design and conduct families of experiments to compare the costbenefits of existing techniques for integration testing applied to evolving object oriented and componentbased software, and evaluate the potential tradeoffs among those techniques. This free online software testing course focuses on testing levels and objectoriented program testing. Encapsulation drives the definition of classes and objects. The shift from traditional to objectoriented environment involves looking at and reconsidering old strategies and methods for testing the software. Whenever large scale systems are designed, object oriented testing is done rather than the conventional testing strategies as the concepts of object oriented programming is way different from that of conventional ones. This article supplies ideas and strategies for integration testing of objectoriented software. Comparing the testing approaches of traditional, object. There is always a negative side of every supposed positive development and the negative side of objectoriented seemed to be the test. Examples of integration testing big bang approach, incremental, top down, bottom up, sandwichhybrid, stub, driver. An approach of integration testing for objectoriented. This means that each class and each instance of a class object packages attributes data and the operations also known as. Only a few papers specically address problems related to integration of object oriented systems 48, 66, 69. We assume that each component is object oriented, that is, it consists of objects with state and behavior.

To provide a context for objectoriented integration testing, we highlight the traditional software and system testing notions that have special implications for objectoriented software testing. Objectoriented programming oop is a very popular and interesting subject. To test objectoriented telecommunication software two test systems were implemented to support class and integration testing. In object oriented systems, testing encompasses three levels, namely, unit testing, subsystem testing, and system testing.

This thesis examines integration testing of objectoriented software. Integration testing of objectoriented software occurs in two different situations. Validation of objectoriented software focuses on user visible actions and outputs from the system. Software testing testing levels and objectoriented program. Pdf objectoriented programming oop is a very popular and interesting subject. This article supplies ideas and strategies for integration. This thesis proposes a new strategy for integration testing of objectoriented. In our previous paper, we propose the design of a tool for analyzing integration testing coverage for objectoriented software. Objectoriented integration testing annals of software. Extensions of the fundamental structured testing techniques for integration testing and objectoriented systems are also presented. When objectoriented software is considered, the concept of the unit changes.

The combined effects of different relationships can result in complex and cyclic dependencies between the classes composing a system, which must be suitably addressed by the integration strategy. The course software testing testing levels and object oriented program testing will introduce you to testing levels above unit testing, to system testing and its categories and types, and to testing object orientated programs oo programs and how it differs from testing procedural programs. Integration testing of objectoriented software georgia tech. We wanted to write this book because most people seem to believe that testing objectoriented software is not much different from testing procedural software. Objectoriented testing is a collection of testing techniques to verify and validate objectoriented software. Testing is a continuous activity during software development. Any incremental class testing approach has to answer. The situation is further complicated by the naive application of theoretical constructs and techniques of traditional software development and testing to objectoriented languages. Software components are amalgamation of logically andor physically related classes. Introduction testing of object oriented software is complicated by the fact that software being tested is often constructed from a combination of previously written, offtheshelf components with some new. One test tool supports the blackbox test of classes by automatically. Introduction to testing objectoriented software who.

Jun 12, 2011 what is the difference between conventional testing and object oriented testing. Object oriented software unit class or small cluster of strongly related classes e. Object oriented testing software testing tutorial minigranth. The components themselves may be specified at different times by different specification groups, yet the. The first book to explore one of the most important developments in software engineering in recent years, object oriented software testing is an important addition to your software development library. We accomplish the automation of both test case generation and test execution for objectoriented programs integration testing. Software testing testing levels and objectoriented. In objectoriented terms, one of the goals of integration testing is to ensure that messages from objects in one class or component are sent and received in the proper order and have the intended effect on the state of the objects that receive the messages. Integration testing objectoriented software systems. Testing takes place to complete the oot cycle mention below testing are required. Software testing can also provide an objective, independent view of the software to allow the business to appreciate and understand the risks of software implementation. The traditional programming consists of procedures operating on data, while the object oriented paradigm focuses on objects that are instances of classes. Learn what is integration testing, its types, and examples. An approach to integration testing of objectoriented programs.

This research project focuses on new ways to address conformance testing and system integration of object oriented software whose specification is dependent upon the use and integration of independent software components. What is the difference between conventional testing and object oriented testing. In object oriented systems, testing encompasses three levels, namely, unit testing, integration testing, and system testing. In objectoriented systems, testing encompasses three levels, namely. Conventional testing is the traditional approach to testing mostly done when water fall life cycle is used for development, while object oriented testing is used when object oriented analysis and design is used for developing enterprise software. Conceptually, classes are encapsulation of data attributes and. Nowadays, object oriented software is more interesting. Feb 05, 2016 test strategies for objectoriented software unit testing in oo context. Unlike unit testing of conventional software, which tends to focus on the algorithmic detail of a module and the data that flow across the module interface, class testing for oo software is driven by the operations encapsulated by the class and the state behavior of the class.

Upon completion of unit testing, the units or modules are to be integrated which gives raise to integration testing. The traditional programming consists of procedures operating on data, while the objectoriented paradigm focuses on objects that are instances of classes. Once all the modules have been unit tested, integration testing is performed. Integration testing methods proposed to date for such systems, however. Pdf integration testing of objectoriented software researchgate. Testing objectoriented software 127 in addition to inheritance and polymorphism, smith and robson 1990 argue that other typical features of objectoriented languages are complex and therefore errorprone. Software engineeringobject oriented testing strategies. Several related software complexity metrics are described. The complexity of objectoriented software is examined. Activation by message passing is argued to be significantly different from conventional. Objectoriented languages create many opportunities for errors.

Software testing is an investigation conducted to provide stakeholders with information about the quality of the software product or service under test. The whole object oriented testing revolves around the fundamental entity known as. Only a few papers specically address problems related to integration of objectoriented systems 48, 66, 69. In unit testing, the individual classes are tested. David taylor, one of the early proponents of objectoriented development, one who even suggested restructuring business processes from an objectoriented point of view, admitted that for most programmers, the amount of testing required for objectoriented software may seem like a major intrusion on what should.

Testing object oriented software practitioners david c. It usually has one or a few inputs and usually a single output. The course software testing testing levels and objectoriented program testing will introduce you to testing levels above unit testing, to system testing and its categories and types, and to testing objectorientated programs oo programs and how it differs from testing procedural programs. A unit is the smallest testable part of any software. This paper we continue our work by proposing an integration. What is integration testing tutorial with integration. The shift from traditional to object oriented environment involves looking at and reconsidering old strategies and methods for testing the software. An integration framework for integrating classes into a system is also proposed. Apr 16, 2020 integration testing is an important part of the testing cycle as it makes it easier to find the defect when two or more modules are integrated. The whole object oriented testing revolves around the fundamental entity known as class. Newer and more efficient means of specifying and testing such business software will result in lower development costs and higher quality. Objectoriented integration testing annals of software engineering. Scalable integration testing o objectoriented software.

Difference between conventional testing and object. Which test design techniques should be applied to unit and integration test classes. Integration testing is an extension of unit testing. A complete software system is also an aggregation of software components.

What is different about testing objectoriented software. With large class libraries, it may be difficult for a developer to comprehend the intended usage. Our work addresses integration testing for objectoriented programs. Software engineering integration testing geeksforgeeks. The surveyed sources address a wide range of practical, theoretical, technical and. It is incumbent on the software testing community to discover additional levels of integration. Some combination of unit testing, integration testing, system testing, regression testing, and acceptance testing will help to deliver usable systems. Software testing can also provide an objective, independent view of the software to allow the business to appreciate. It starts by testing modules at the finest level of the programming hierarchy and then moves towards the lower levels. Conceptually, classes are encapsulation of data attributes and their assoc. Objectoriented programming has some unique features which facilitate software reuse and componentbased development. Objectoriented programming increases software reusability, extensibility, interoperability, and reliability.

The relationship of integration testing and the software development life cycle is presented. State is determined by state variables for each object and behavior is determined. Integration testing is the process of testing the interface between two software units or module. We still need system testing to verify that software meets requirements. Briefly explain unit and integration testing in the oo. We still do integration testing to make sure various subsystems can work correctly in concert. An integration testing coverage tool for objectoriented software.

We assume that each component is objectoriented, that is, it consists of objects with state and behavior. In our previous paper, we propose the design of a tool for analyzing integration testing coverage for object oriented software. Integration testing applied for oo software targets to uncover the possible faults in both operation calls and various types of messages like a message sent to invoke an object. Section3 examines the testing approaches adopted in objectoriented software development. Integration testing is conducted to evaluate the compliance of a system or component with specified functional requirements. Integration testing of objectoriented components using. Section2 examines the testing approaches applied for conventional software development. Difference between unit testing and integration testing. Mar 20, 2016 objectoriented testing is a collection of testing techniques to verify and validate objectoriented software. Testing object oriented software 129 tional testing.

An integration testing coverage tool for objectoriented. Class testing for objectoriented software is the equivalent of unit testing for conventional software focuses on operations encapsulated by the class and the state behavior of the class integration testing in oo context. Integration testing is the process of testing the interface between two software units or modules. Mary jean harrold, alessandro orso, gregg rothermel when objectoriented and componentbased software systems are developed, they must be integration tested. However, we cannot use existing integration testing coverage measures with object oriented software. Black box tesing, white box testing, regression testing, smoke testing, test strategies for objectoriented software, validation testing, a strategic approach to testing, system testing, organizing for software testing, strategic issues, unit testing, integration testing, non incremental integration testing, topdown and bottomup integration. The components themselves may be specified at different times by different specification groups, yet the integration of all of the pieces must work.

Learning objectives testing object oriented software. The purpose of integration testing is to verify the functional, performance, and reliability between the modules that are integrated. Encapsulation drives the definition of classes and. Unit testing is a level of software testing where individual units components of a software are tested. This means that each class and each instance of a class object packages attributes data and the operations also known as methods or services that manipulate these data. Difference between conventional testing and object oriented. The objectoriented testing constructs we introduce here are deliberately behavioral rather than structural. This research project focuses on new ways to address conformance testing and system integration of objectoriented software whose specification is dependent upon the use and integration of independent software components. Conceptually, classes are encapsulation of data attributes and their associated functions. Object oriented programming oop is a very popular and interesting subject. However, interest and work in this area is growing, as figure 1 and table i show. We present an approach that effectively tests objectoriented programs at the in tegration level. Integration testing also ensures that the integrated modules work properly as expected.

280 1503 1616 1625 360 1292 937 1063 449 799 38 167 393 262 284 145 55 1463 594 1035 1299 185 1183 1076 1120 338 776 423 497 643 786 1391 112 1318 1214 1431 667 347 879 333 228 244